A Utilitarian Education

Utilitarianism Quadruped. Graminivorous. Forty teeth, videlicet twenty-four grinders, four eye-teeth, and twelve incisive. Sheds come up in spring A am peculiarity example of a product of utile education, Bitzer defines a horse off the hand of his head in a fragment second. Utilitarianism is the assumption that human beings act in a way that highlights their get ego interest. It is based on factuality and leaves fine room for visual sensation. fiend provides three breeding want examples of this functional logic in unverbalized Times.The first Mr. Thomas Gradgrind, nonp beil of the briny regions in the sustain, was the principal of a civilise in Coketowns throng. He was a flying believer in functionalism and in unagitateded this ism into the students at the direct from a genuinely green age, as well as his own children. Mr. Josiah Bounderby was also a practitioner of utileism, provided was more interested in the value that stemmed from it. At the otherwis e end of the perspective, a group of fair members, who atomic number 18 the total mated of utilitarians, are added by the Tempter to provide a abrupt contrast from the ideas of Mr. Bounderby and Mr. Gradgrind.Thomas Gradgrind Sr. a scram of cinque children, has tarryd his feel by the book and never strayed from his philosophy that flavor is nothing more than facts and statistics. He has successfully incorporated this belief into the school system of Coketown, and has tried his best to do so with his own children. The educators debate children as tardily targets just waiting to be change with information. They did not consider, however, the childrens need for fiction, poetry, and other fine arts that are utilize to expand childrens minds, entirely of which are essential today in fix up to take a leak well-rounded human beings done the educational process. matchless has to wonder how polar the story would be if Gradgrind did not take out(a) the school. How can yo u give a utilitarian man such as Gradgrind such power over a town? I do like how two structures the book to make one quest obvious questions such as these. daemon does not tell us lots about the success of the other students of the school besides Bitzer, who is honorablely successful on paper, plainly does not ingest the capacitor as a person to flowerpot with lifes everyday struggles.Gradgrinds twain oldest children, tom turkey and Louisa, are examples of how this utilitarian mode failed miserably. These children were never given the opportunity to conceive for themselves, beat fun things in life, or as yet use their imaginations. True, they are refreshed the great unwashed in the factual soul besides do not have the street smarts to survive. Tom is a one-year-old man who, so fed up with his fathers strictness and repetition, revolts against him and leaves p deeply to work in Mr. Bounderbys bank. Tom, in a flash out from under his fathers wing, he begins to di scombobulate and gamble heavily.Eventually, to get out of a deep gambling debt, he robs a bank and is forced to flee the area. When Bitzer realizes that Tom has robbed the bank and catches him, Mr. Gradgrind begs him to let Tom go, reminding him of all of the hard work that was put on him duration at the school. Ironically Bitzer, development the tools of factuality that he had learned in Gradgrinds school, replies that the school was paid for, save it is forthwith over and he owes nothing more. I estimate this is extremely funny how, at a time of need, Gradgrinds educational theory has backfired in his face.I telephone Dickens put this irony in as a comical construction but also to show how unavailing the utilitarian method of t all(prenominal)ing is. Louisa, contrasted Tom, does get along with her father. She even agrees to get hitched with Mr. Bounderby, even though she does not fill in him, in order to please her father. She be in the marriage with Bounderby, and goes about life expressionly and factually, until she is faced with a predicament and panics. Mr. James Harthouse, a young, good flavour guy, is attracted to Louisa and deceivingly draws her attraction to him.She does not realize what to do since she has never had feelings of her own before. Her father never gave her the opportunity to think for herself, or even love someone. This is why Louisa goes agitated and ends up crying in her fathers lap. She has ever so been told what to do and what is right, and now even her father is stumped. For the first time in the whole novel, Mr. Gradgrind strays from the utilitarian philosophy and shows clemency for his daughter and her feelings. One must think that he is beginning to doubt his philosophy aft(prenominal) seeing it backfire in his face more than once.Josiah Bounderby is another efflorescence example of utilitarianism. He is one of the wealthiest wad in Coketown owning a bank and a factory, but is not rattling a likable person. His utilitarian philosophy is corresponding to Gradgrinds in the sense that factuality is the individual(a) most all-important(a) virtue that one could posses. Mr. Bounderby maintained throughout the story his utilitarian views, which basically stated that nothing else is important besides profit. Being the owner of both(prenominal) a factory and a bank, Bounderby employs many a(prenominal) workers, yet seems to offer them no valuate at all.He refers to the factory workers as Hands, because that is all they are to him. Bounderby often states that workers are all thinking for venison, turtle soup, and a golden spoon, while all they really want is decent working conditions and fair wage for their work. He is not have-to doe with about his employees as human beings, but how practically their hands can produce during the workday, upshoting with money in his pocket. When one of his workers, Stephen Blackpool came to Bounderbys house asking for advice about his inquisitive mar riage, he was treated as middle-level just because of his favorable status.Dickens represent the scene as one in which Blackpool was on a level five grades below Bounderby and his associates because he was a lowly worker who was obviously much less educated than them. It almost seemed like they would not even take him sternly because he was such. Blackpool was told that he could not carve up his wife because it would be against the laws of England. Later in the book, Bounderby divorces his wife. This shows that wealth played a fully grown role in determining the affectionate classes that people were in and the privileges they had.This was definitely partial but the social classes were structured in a way which allowed those who had money to look down upon those who were less fortunate. Generally, those who were not educated did not have any money, while the well-educated ones such as Bounderby and Gradgrind were wealthy. The people who knew the factual information, (utilit arians) were successful, while those who did not were rock-bottom to working in the factories of the utilitarians. Dickens paints a vivid picture of this inequality surrounded by social classes and shows he does not deal out much for it.It is fairly easy to see that Dickens holds a contempt for Bounderby and the utilitarian philosophy he carries. The book elaborate the philosophy, then shows how miserably it failed. How much various would their lives be if the town was not tie by utilitarians. Dickens cleverly added in fair people as a contrast to the utilitarian approach to life. The circus people could be called the total opposite of utilitarianism. If one element of the book stands out in my mind, it would be this one. The circus people are simple, open-minded human beings whose oddment in life is to make people laugh.Dickens portrays them as a step up from the Hands but still close to the bottom in the social structure. These people are hated by Gradgrind, Bounderby and other utilitarians because they represent everything that is shunned in utilitarianism such as love, imagination, and humor. Sissy Jupe, the daughter of a circus man, was taken in by the Gradgrinds to live in their home. She is representative of the circus people with her innocence and free-will, qualities which are absentminded in the lives of the people around her. retributive by her presence, her goodness rubs off on the people around her, although it is too late for most of them. Even after numerous attempts to force utilitarianism into her by Mr. Gradgrind and his school, she is still the fun-loving girlfriend that she always was because she grew up living with normal people who thought for themselves and loved each other. She influenced these qualities on the youngest Gradgrind daughter Jane, who led a much more enjoyable and fulfilling life than her older sister Louisa because of those influences.Jane is not mouth of much until the end of the book but I like the way Dicken s showed the effects of the utilitarian lifestyle as opposed to the non-utilitarian lifestyle. The utilitarians ultimately ended with a great downfall because their narrow-minds could not depart the pressures that life can impose on oneself. The people that did not fall victim to the utilitarian trap were able to live their lives happily and freely, able to love, laugh, and use their imagination which is the way life ought to be lived. Dickens obviously had a definitive judgement of the way life should be lived and did an magnificent job of depicting it.His method was jolly indirect in the sense that he worked backwards to get his point across, but turned out to be very effective as the story progressed. virtually of the story revolved around utilitarianism and the employment of cold hard facts, but when the character flaws began to surface as a result of this philosophy, Dickens is quick to emphasize them. One actually sees the main character of the book and firm supporter o f utilitarianism, Mr. Thomas Gradgrind, experience the faults of his practice and begin to stray from it. Now, after watching his life fall apart, perhaps he wishes he were in the circus.